First post on NOLA mayoral race

Progressive New Orleans mayoral candidate James Perry up with "edgy" TV ad.

"Labor Fight Ends in Win for Students" -- and, um, for the 1200 workers getting their jobs back

Because I know not everyone reads back to the Business section... Here's Steven Greenhouse's article today on a big victory yesterday. United Students Against Sweatshops announced Tuesday that:

it had achieved its biggest victory by far. Its pressure tactics persuaded one of the nation’s leading sportswear companies, Russell Athletic, to agree to rehire 1,200 workers in Honduras who lost their jobs when Russell closed their factory soon after the workers had unionized.

End of an era? Washington Blade closed

The Washington Blade, a 40-year-old gay newspaper in DC, was abruptly closed by its owner, Window Media, on Monday, along with several of the chain's other local LGBT papers. Windows Media filed for bankruptcy. See Washington Post, Washington City Paper, and Queerty.

Within hours, Blade employees (former employees?) pledged that they would, in some form, continue the publication.

This afternoon, the Washington Post reports:

At a coffee shop Tuesday morning in the lobby of the office building that was their former home, Kevin Naff, the Blade's editor, convened his staff -- now volunteers -- handed out assignments and made plans for a vastly scaled-down issue.

...

Naff said he and other former Blade staffers have been inundated with offers of help, from landlords willing to donate office space to freelance writers willing to work for free.

It looks as if the immediate product will be a Kinko's job, funded out of pocket; whether some investor jumps in to pay for the thing for real (incl 20 salaries, etc), remains to be seen.

Update: Zach of TheNewGay.net writes:

The Blade’s insistence on only covering the most vapid, the most A-list, the most anti-intellectual, camp-at-all-costs, male dominated aspects of our life have done real and lasting damage to the 90% of us who don’t fit so narrow a rubric.

Wes holding class at a CT prison

In the NYT today, Wesleyan teaching classes at a prison in CT.

I know a few of you out there were part of the organizing starting the push (2004 or so?) to make this happen. Kudos to Wes for making it happen.

In comments on the article, someone writes:

It comes down to philosophy - are prisons to reform or exact revenge. If it is reform, this is a way to go. If it is revenge, make them take organic chemestry.

BPA in the News

The FDA is slated to release a new report on BPA safety at some point in the coming weeks, so the matter will probably be back in the news a bit more intensely. The FDA report probably won't say anything that definitive though, and it's not something where anyone knows yet very concretely how bad the harm is.

There was a recent Consumer Reports investigation showing that BPA is in and leaches from many "BPA-free" cans. But what will get the public and lawmakers concerned if we don't know yet how bad the effects are? Perhaps that BPA has now been linked to a new problem. As the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reported:

The five-year study examined 634 workers in factories in China, comparing those working in BPA-manufacturing facilities with a control group working in plants where no BPA was made. The study found workers in the BPA facilities had four times the risk of erectile dysfunction, and seven times more risk of ejaculation difficulty.

Obligatory post on Belichick's decision

When Bill Belichick decided to go for it on 4th and 2 last night, I thought it was pretty extreme, and not the right decision. And of course the reaction from almost all quarters after the game has been that it was a crazy decision.

But this morning the number cruncher people looked at it, and there's an awfully strong defense for Belichick's decision. Here are two of the analyses (AdvancedNFLStats and ZEUS) that are getting attention today.

Of course, there's plenty of question exactly which numbers are appropriate to use (i.e. do you look at how often the Patriots have converted on 4th down plays of under 3 yards just this year? Or do you average it out over the last five years? etc). But those two analyses suggest that Belichick was pretty clearly right no matter which of the reasonable numbers you use for your calculation.

Judy Battista has more (non-quantitative) general analysis on the decision.

This specific decision aside, there's certainly a wealth of literature showing that teams do not go for it on 4th down nearly as often as they should.

On the limits of Antiracism

Also via Jason's Blog (now you owe me!), see Adolph Reed Jr. on "The limits of anti-racism."

The contemporary discourse of “antiracism” is focused much more on taxonomy than politics. It emphasizes the name by which we should call some strains of inequality—whether they should be broadly recognized as evidence of “racism”— over specifying the mechanisms that produce them or even the steps that can be taken to combat them.

Some of it is over my head but a lot of it sounds about right to me.

Of course, you could note that Reed's reading of the United States today includes predicting definitely that Obama would lose to McCain.

Veryln Klinkenborg, tell us about the seasons

You know those annoying pieces about nature and stuff on the NYT editorial page by editorial writer Verlyn Klinkenborg? You know, the ones that take up space where actual, you know, important issues could be discussed? It turns out there's a blog dedicated to making fun of them. And I think that's great. Via Jason's Blog, I learned of the site, called "Verylyn Klinkenborg, In Summary."

My personal gripe with Klinkenborg is that a couple years ago he reffered to the Coney Island Cyclone as the "oldest roller coaster in the world." It's not; not even close.

Filling the judiciary, slowly

Charlie Savage has an update in Sunday's NYT on the status of Obama's nominees for the federal judiciary (see also Jeffrey Toobin's piece in the New Yorker a few weeks ago on the subject). The White House says that while the nominations are slow, the total confirmed nominees will match the pace of the Bush Administration, because they're working carefully with the Republican senators, and so there will be a wave of confirmations ahead. And then:

But Nan Aron, president of the liberal Alliance for Justice, warned that picking moderate judges and low-key tactics might not work.

“It’s a mistake to think that by going slower and lessening the visibility of nominations, Republican acrimony will be reduced,” she said. “It didn’t work with Clinton and it won’t work now because Republicans will do everything in their power to hold open as many seats as they can for a future president to fill.”

It's hard to imagine that she's not correct.

KSM being tried in New York, in perspective

The announcement Friday that KSM and four others will be tried in a civilian court in NYC -- rather than in a military tribunal at Gitmo -- is welcome news.

But, Glenn Greenwald argues, don't get too excited: we're now at an officiallya multi-tiered justice system, where the government decides what kind of justice system different prisoners will get depending on where the government is sure it can get a conviction. This is hardly great news.

Meanwhile, Jim Webb is with the right wingers: don't bring those terrorists onto our soil!

Politico's Josh Gerstein has the real breaking news on CAIR

In "Despite ban, Holder to speak to CAIR-linked group" Politico's Josh Gerstein reports:

Attorney General Eric Holder has agreed to give a keynote speech next week to a Michigan group which includes the local branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations even though the FBI has formally severed contacts with the controversial Muslim civil rights organization.

Stop the presses! I mean, really. This is news? This what the right wing can come up with these days on CAIR and the Obama Administration?

With CAIR - a favorite target of the right wing - I've always though the absence of evidence principle is appropriate. In other words, there are so many right wing organizations and blogs trying to find criminal connections to CAIR, and that they've come up with so little ought to say at least something. The NYT's useful review of the matters from 2007 is here.

After federal prosecutors named CAIR "unindicted co-conspirators" in the Holy Land Foundation case later in 2007, it was Gerstein -- writing in the New York Sun, actually -- who noted:

The practice of publicly naming unindicted co-conspirators is frowned on by some in the legal community, chiefly because there is no trial or other mechanism for those named to challenge their designation. Justice Department guidelines discourage the public identification of unindicted co-conspirators by the government.

"In all public filings and proceedings, federal prosecutors should remain sensitive to the privacy and reputation interests of uncharged third-parties," the Justice Department's manual for prosecutors says. When co-conspirator lists have to be filed in court, prosecutors should seek to file them under seal, the guidelines say.

And in the Politico piece this week, he notes:

CAIR officials have denied any connection to terrorism and have complained bitterly about being named as co-conspirators in the Holy Land case. They note that since the group was never charged it had no forum to challenge the documents prosecutors said linked CAIR to the Muslim Brotherhood. CAIR officials have also noted that aspects of the documents are not consistent with CAIR’s activities.

Good for Gerstein.

But the point remains: this piece isn't news in the first place.

It's gotten picked up in the right-wing blogs, of course, but otherwise hasn't gone mainstream. It will be interesting to see if any of the majors pick it up.

DC settles for $450,000 for its illegal interrogations at A20

The Washington Post reports this week on the fallout from the 2002 incident:

For years, authorities suggested that the interrogation never happened. FBI and D.C. police said they had no records of such an incident. And police told a federal court that no FBI agents were present when officers arrested the protesters for trespassing.

But as attorneys for the protesters were preparing for the trial, which was scheduled to begin in federal court Nov. 30, they unearthed D.C. police logs that confirm the role of a secret FBI intelligence unit in the incident.

You know you live on a cool block when...

My first of the season

And it was as delicious as it looks.

Swine flu vs. rape: a comparison of two responses

Meg Stone asks: "What if we did as much to prevent rape as we do to prevent H1N1?"

The CDC reported just over 43,000 cases of H1N1 between April and July of this year and estimates that it will affect a million people, or 0.3% of the total population of the United States. Compare this to the 2.5% of women and 0.9% of men who reported being raped or sexually assaulted in the past year.

...

H1N1 is not getting any attention it shouldn’t – it’s getting the attention all public health crises should.

Dear Brooklyn Brewery, Four is Not the New Six

Um...?



I still bought this because it was on sale. But I took the picture off-center to show where the other two bottles would be.

It's just the BCS that has gone down to four bottles, and the 4-pack seems to be priced the same as their other 6-packs. (I think the 6-packs of BCS used to be a bit more than the other 6-packs, but not that much - this site says about a dollar more, which sounds right). This is troubling.

House roll call on anti-Goldstone Report resolution

Here's the roll call from the House yesterday on the resolution condemning the Goldstone Report (on the Gaza War, or whatever we should be calling it, from Dec/Jan).

344 Yes, 36 No, 22 present, 22 not voting. The resolution had plenty that was factually questionable; Ron Kampeas reviewed the back-and-forth between Goldstone and Reps Berman, Ros-Lehtinen and Ackerman. They did change the resolution somewhat, but left a resolution that was still awful, of course.

The roll call is sad; it's mostly just the usual progressives (and hardly all of them) who voted no, though a few random non-progressives at least voted present or didn't show. The most interesting thing is that Gary Ackerman (chair of the Middle East and South Asia subcommittee in the Foreign Affairs committee) ended up not voting.

Some of the disappointing yes votes include Danny Davis, Barney Frank, Jay Inslee, John Lewis, Ed Markey, Brad Miller, Gwen Moore, Jerry Nadler, Jared Polis, Jan Schakowsky, Jose Serrano and Henry Waxman. If I'm not mistaken all of these folks are quite comfortable in their seats.

Was Thompson the "underfinanced" candidate?

The New York Times has done plenty of coverage on how Bloomberg spent exorbitant sums of money on the election. But in the their lead piece on the results of that race, they refer to Thompson as "vastly underfinanced."

Political types would certainly agree.

But that seems to me to be making a judgment about what the "right" amount of money to have is (some number which Thompson did not reach), and therefore implicitly endorsing our system of money-based elections. Yeah, they have to explain events within the context of how the current political system works, but at the same time they don't have to actively choose to perpetuate that system.

Post refers to West Bank as "disputed territory"

Karen DeYoung's "In face of Arab anger, Clinton amends view on Israel's offer to curb West Bank growth" in Tuesday's Post has this:

Clinton insisted that the administration still considers settlement activity on disputed territory "illegitimate" and advocates a freeze.

It's too bad. The Post has managed to stick away from "disputed territory" since March. And in a related matter, they've even referred to settlements as "not legal internationally," and "legal under Israeli law but not internationally."

The notion that the West Bank is "disputed territory" doesn't convey the truth. Its status is clear: it is occupied by Israel. It's not part of Israel.

Will swine flue make paid sick day legislation move?

Federal legislation to require employers to provide paid sick days has not gotten far. But maybe swing flu will help.

Today Steven Greenhouse has a piece on it in the NYT business section, and the National Labor Committee has a related report ("Wal-Mart's Sick Leave Policy Risks Spreading Swine Flu").

Some employers are left giving pretty sad answers. From NYT:

White Castle does not provide paid sick days, he acknowledged, but he said that workers who stayed home sick would not suffer lost pay because they could work extra hours after recovering.

Oh, problem solved!

But seriously. Not giving people paid sick days means many of them will work while they have swine flu. Employers don't want to admit it, but it's true. And part of the problem is that the true costs of this situation are somewhat externalized from the company. In other words, when an infected employee comes to work, that has some costs for the company (like infecting other workers, lower productivity). But some of the cost goes outside the company (infecting customers).

I don't know if it's at all possible to try to do a cost-benefit on this kind of stuff, or that we should do it even if it is, or that if we do it, the externalized costs are what would push the cost higher than the benefits. My point is more just that employers who don't give paid sick days are not only harming their own workers, but the general public, and legislators (be this state or federal) ought to recognize that.

Update: Wonkroom has a post just up, "Chamber Scoffs At Lack Of Paid Sick Leave: ‘The Problem Is Not Nearly As Great As Some People Say.’" They point to some of the research there is on the economic calculations.

The filibuster today

David Roberts at Grist reviews the history of the filibuster and where we are today:

Step back a moment and appreciate what’s happened: this amounts to an radical change in our constitutional system of governance, drastically increasing the difficulty of passing legislation to address the nation’s challenges. Not only did the country never openly debate it; not only did Congress never vote on it; nobody even talks about it!

Below is a chart he has, via Norm Orenstein:

A sad day

I just gave in and added 'geoengineering' to the dictionary in my email program. Oy.

na-GOUR-ney-ism (n.)

Adam Nagourney: "Off-year elections are typically the subject of frenzied discussion and overinterpretation by political observers..." But he's going to go ahead and do it anyway.

For WashPost, Honduras agreement is a victory. Just not how you thought.

Say what you will about the agreement, reached late Thursday night, in Honduras. It's not completely clear what the national assembly will do from here, or that the conditions for free and fair elections will now necessarily be in place by a month from now, though they could be.

But what would the Washington Post editorial page say about it all? They declare it a win for Honduras, and particularly for the Obama Administration's diplomacy, which is sort of the emerging CW. Whatever, that has some truth to it, though I think it misses the point that, you know, a deposed government is having to agree to potential 'power-sharing.'

For Jackson Diehl and Fred Hiatt at the Post, though, this was all about Hugo Chavez, of course. In fact:

The beauty of the U.S.-brokered deal is that it is founded on democratic process -- the very thing the Chavistas want to destroy. The Honduran Congress will vote on whether to restore Mr. Zelaya to office for the three months remaining in his term. Mr. Zelaya says he has the votes to return as president, but if he does, he will head a "government of reconciliation," and the armed forces will report to the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, a presidential election previously scheduled for Nov. 29 will go forward with international support and regional recognition for the winner. Neither of the two leading presidential candidates supports Mr. Zelaya or his agenda, which means that Honduras's democracy should be preserved, and Mr. Chávez's attempted coup rebuffed.

Chavez's attempted coup? Huh?

Newsweek's other reality

Newsweek says: "Like Mussolini and Stalin before him, Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez has erected his very own movie studio."

Borev.net has the story.

Peter Orszag's lovely touch on Fred Hiatt

Krugman today mentions a spat between OMB director Peter Orszag and WashPost editorial page editor Fred Hiatt over healthcare. Krugman:

Mr. Hiatt had criticized Congress for not taking what he considers the necessary steps to control health-care costs — namely, taxing high-cost insurance plans and establishing an independent Medicare commission.Writing on the budget office blog — yes, there is one, and it’s essential reading — Mr. Orszag pointed out, not too gently, that the Senate Finance Committee’s bill actually includes both of the allegedly missing measures.

"Not too gently" -- this is going to be fun! So I checked the excerpt from Orszag's blog post ("Missing the Boat on Cost Containment") directly:

Fred Hiatt in today’s Washington Post is the latest of these naysayers, writing in his column that the two biggest steps that can be taken to reduce the rate of health care cost growth — changes in health care’s tax treatment and an independent Medicare commission — are missing. I agree with Hiatt on the potential substantial benefits in terms of cost containment from these two changes. But a note to readers who have not read their Washington Post the past few weeks: the Senate Finance Committee bill includes both of these measures.

Ouch.